| | | | |

Academic Medical Centers Extend Peritoneal Mesothelioma Survival

academic medical centersA new published study suggests that peritoneal mesothelioma patients treated at academic medical centers survive much longer than those who get their care at community hospitals.

The study was conducted by Harvard Medical School researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. 

Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive cancer of abdominal membranes. There is no known cure. The new study compared outcomes and survival among more than 2,600 mesothelioma patients. Patients were treated at high-volume academic hospitals or community cancer centers. 

The results suggest that academic medical centers consistently provide more advanced and potentially life-extending care for this complex cancer. 

Experience is Critical for Mesothelioma Care

Malignant mesothelioma is the name for cancers that occur on internal membranes. It is almost always caused by exposure to asbestos. Usually that exposure happened on the job. Often, it occurred decades before. 

Peritoneal mesothelioma accounts for about 500 cases of mesothelioma in the US every year. Many doctors who do not work at academic medical centers have never seen a single case. This is problematic because peritoneal mesothelioma is difficult to treat. 

The gold standard treatment is cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). During CRS/HIPEC, surgeons remove as much mesothelioma as they can from the abdomen. Then they rinse the abdomen with heated chemotherapy drugs to kill residual cells. 

CRS/HIPEC requires a high level of expertise. Experienced surgeons produce the best outcomes. They are also more likely to be working at academic medical centers than in community cancer hospitals. 

Survival at Community Cancer Centers vs Academic Medical Centers

The study included 2,682 peritoneal mesothelioma patients. The data came from the National Cancer Center database. Patients received mesothelioma treatment between 2004 and 2016. Forty-seven percent were treated at an academic medical center. Fifty-two percent were treated at a community hospital. 

Almost 43 percent of patients treated at academic facilities had mesothelioma surgery (PD or EPP). Even though it is the standard of care, only 20 percent of community hospital patients had surgery. 

Twenty-nine percent of the academic medical center patients had HIPEC after surgery. This only happened 10 percent of the time at community cancer centers. 

Most importantly, the median overall survival for patients treated at high-volume centers was two years and eight months. That is a sharp contrast to the 11.6 months median overall survival among those treated locally. Nearly 30 percent of peritoneal mesothelioma patients treated at academic medical centers were still alive five years later. At community hospitals, that figure was only 18.3 percent. 

“Patients at academic centers underwent surgery and received chemotherapy on the same day as surgery more frequently than those at community centers, suggesting that malignant peritoneal mesothelioma patients may be better served at experienced academic centers,” concludes lead author and general surgeon Vanessa Welten, MD, MPH. 

If you need help finding a mesothelioma specialist in your region, CLICK HERE to get started. 

Source: 

Welten, V, et al, “Survival Outcomes for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma at Academic Versus Community Hospitals”, July 21, 2021, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11605-021-05084-0

 

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Doctors Describe "Concrete Therapeutic Approach" for Mesothelioma

    A team of medical researchers in Italy have achieved what they are calling “excellent” tumor control and survival results in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients using a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Caused by exposure to asbestos, mesothelioma typically spreads quickly across the lung-encasing membrane called the pleura. There is no known cure but treatments are improving. In the current prospective study, 20 malignant pleural mesothelioma patients underwent radical pleurectomy/decortication followed by high doses of radiation. After surgeons removed as much of the visible mesothelioma tumor and surrounding tissue as possible, patients received 50Gy of radiation to the effected side of their chest, delivered in 25 fractions. Regions of particular concern for mesothelioma regrowth got an extra radiation “boost” to…

  • | |

    Does Radiotherapy Reduce Mesothelioma Pain?

    A new study says there is not enough evidence to support the use of radiotherapy for the treatment of pain associated with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Researchers at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland reviewed a range of past studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy by searching databases that date back as far as 1974. To be eligible to be included in their review, the study had to focus on malignant pleural mesothelioma and radiotherapy given “with the intent of improving pain”. The study also had to report doses and fractionation of the radiotherapy and how the pain responded. In all, the researchers found eight studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy that met the criteria. Two of the studies were prospective…

  • |

    Ape Virus Shrinks Mesothelioma Tumors in Lab

    A virus that causes leukemia in gibbon apes may have the power to help fight malignant mesothelioma in people. Gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV) has been tested for years as a viral vector, a carrier of therapeutic genetic information, in the treatment of various human illnesses, including cancer. A new study in Japan compared GALV with a leukemia virus derived from mice to see which carrier communicated most efficiently with mesothelioma cells. While both types of viruses replicated in most of the mesothelioma cell lines tested, the mouse-derived virus was not effective in a mesothelioma cell line called ACC-MESO-1. In this cell line, only the GALV spread efficiently both in culture and in mice that had been given human mesothelioma…

  • | |

    Radiotherapy for Mesothelioma: Better But Still Limited

    A form of highly-targeted radiation therapy for mesothelioma is better than it used to be, but is still risky. That is the message of a recent article on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Author Kenneth E. Rosenzweig, MD, a Radiation Oncologist with Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, reviewed recent studies on IMRT and mesothelioma. He concludes that, while the “troubling toxicity” associated with IMRT when it was first introduced has not been entirely eliminated, the fact that clinicians now have more experience with it is making a positive difference for mesothelioma patients. Before targeted therapies like IMRT were available, high-dose radiation was not usually a feasible option for mesothelioma since the irregular shape…

  • | |

    A Second-Line Option for Mesothelioma?

    Although survival was not significantly extended, the chemotherapy drug vinorelbine might be a treatment option for mesothelioma patients whose cancer has returned after first-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed. A new study on vinorelbine as a second-line treatment finds that the drug is “moderately active” in mesothelioma patients who were initially treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Pemetrexed (Alimta), along with a platinum-based drug like cisplatin, is the primary first-line drug therapy for mesothelioma. But vinorelbine is gaining attention as a possible option for mesothelioma, in part because it is available in a less expensive generic form. In “Vinorelbine in pemetrexed-pretreated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma”, the Italian authors detail the results of their study on 59 patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma.  These patients…

  • | |

    Repeat HIPEC Improves Mesothelioma Survival

    If one cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC procedure for mesothelioma is good, subsequent treatments may be even better. That is the central message of research conducted at the Moffitt Cancer Center in Florida. The study’s aim was to assess overall survival among peritoneal mesothelioma patients who had not just one, but two or more rounds of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery. The cytoreduction/HIPEC approach has become popular for peritoneal mesothelioma, a treatment-resistant cancer of abdominal membranes caused by asbestos. Cytoreductive surgery involves removing as much of the mesothelioma tumor as possible from the abdomen. Because the shape and spreading pattern of mesothelioma tumors make complete cytoreduction difficult, the surgery is often followed by a rinse with a heated solution…