| |

Chemoperfusion Treatment for Mesothelioma: Chemo Without the Side Effects?

Chemoperfusion Treatment for Mesothelioma

New research suggests that chemoperfusion treatment for mesothelioma may buy patients more time without the side effects of traditional chemotherapy. 

Chemoperfusion treatment involves injecting cancer-killing drugs directly into the vessels that feed a pleural mesothelioma tumor. 

The research was presented during a virtual session of the Society of Interventional Radiology’s annual meeting. Researchers showed how this novel approach could improve quality of life for mesothelioma patients. 

Limitations of Chemotherapy

Pleural mesothelioma is a rare cancer with few treatment options. Most mesothelioma patients start with chemotherapy. Alimta (pemetrexed) is the primary chemotherapy drug for mesothelioma. 

But chemotherapy has drawbacks that chemoperfusion treatment for mesothelioma might avoid. 

Conventional chemotherapy circulates drugs throughout the body. That means that normal cells can absorb them the same as cancer cells. This can cause serious side effects. Often, the treatment either does not work or has to stop because it makes the patient too sick.

Mesothelioma surgery is another option. But it carries many risks and only a small percentage of patients are good candidates. 

Potential Benefits of Chemoperfusion Treatment for Mesothelioma

The study comes from the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa. Researchers ran a three-year study on transarterial chemoperfusion treatment for mesothelioma. 

Twenty-seven patients enrolled between 2016 and 2019. All had tumors that kept growing in spite of standard chemotherapy. Four patients also had radiotherapy and three underwent surgery. 

Patients received a mix of cisplatin, methotrexate and gemcitabine. Doctors injected the mix directly into one or both of the arteries that supply the pleural membrane. They repeated the treatment every four weeks. 

“We were pleasantly surprised to find that this treatment doesn’t come with the same side effects of traditional intravenous chemotherapy,” said Bela Kis, MD, PhD. Dr. Kis is the principal investigator on the study and an interventional radiologist at the Moffitt Cancer Center.

“To see these promising results with so few side effects means we are able to make a positive impact on quality of life for these patients,” he says.

The disease control rate with chemoperfusion treatment for mesothelioma was 70 percent. One patient had a partial response and 18 had stable disease. No one died from the treatment. The median overall survival rate was 8.5 months from the start of the treatment. 

The researchers hope to expand their study to other cancer centers with larger groups of mesothelioma patients. It is challenging to study new treatments for mesothelioma because the disease is so rare. Only about 2,500 Americans receive a mesothelioma diagnosis each year. 

Source:

“Transarterial Chemoperfusion Treatment of Unresectable Pleural Mesothelioma – Interim Results of a Phase 2 Prospective Study”, Presentation during Society of Interventional Radiology annual conference, https://www.sirmeeting.org/index.cfm?do=abs.viewAbs&abs=543

“Novel treatment for mesothelioma shows promise for patients”, June 14, 2020, Society of Interventional Radiology news release, https://www.sirweb.org/advocacy-and-outreach/media/news-release-archive/sir-2020-mesothelioma-061520/

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Doctors Describe "Concrete Therapeutic Approach" for Mesothelioma

    A team of medical researchers in Italy have achieved what they are calling “excellent” tumor control and survival results in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients using a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Caused by exposure to asbestos, mesothelioma typically spreads quickly across the lung-encasing membrane called the pleura. There is no known cure but treatments are improving. In the current prospective study, 20 malignant pleural mesothelioma patients underwent radical pleurectomy/decortication followed by high doses of radiation. After surgeons removed as much of the visible mesothelioma tumor and surrounding tissue as possible, patients received 50Gy of radiation to the effected side of their chest, delivered in 25 fractions. Regions of particular concern for mesothelioma regrowth got an extra radiation “boost” to…

  • | |

    Does Radiotherapy Reduce Mesothelioma Pain?

    A new study says there is not enough evidence to support the use of radiotherapy for the treatment of pain associated with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Researchers at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland reviewed a range of past studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy by searching databases that date back as far as 1974. To be eligible to be included in their review, the study had to focus on malignant pleural mesothelioma and radiotherapy given “with the intent of improving pain”. The study also had to report doses and fractionation of the radiotherapy and how the pain responded. In all, the researchers found eight studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy that met the criteria. Two of the studies were prospective…

  • | |

    Radiotherapy for Mesothelioma: Better But Still Limited

    A form of highly-targeted radiation therapy for mesothelioma is better than it used to be, but is still risky. That is the message of a recent article on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Author Kenneth E. Rosenzweig, MD, a Radiation Oncologist with Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, reviewed recent studies on IMRT and mesothelioma. He concludes that, while the “troubling toxicity” associated with IMRT when it was first introduced has not been entirely eliminated, the fact that clinicians now have more experience with it is making a positive difference for mesothelioma patients. Before targeted therapies like IMRT were available, high-dose radiation was not usually a feasible option for mesothelioma since the irregular shape…

  • | |

    A Second-Line Option for Mesothelioma?

    Although survival was not significantly extended, the chemotherapy drug vinorelbine might be a treatment option for mesothelioma patients whose cancer has returned after first-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed. A new study on vinorelbine as a second-line treatment finds that the drug is “moderately active” in mesothelioma patients who were initially treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Pemetrexed (Alimta), along with a platinum-based drug like cisplatin, is the primary first-line drug therapy for mesothelioma. But vinorelbine is gaining attention as a possible option for mesothelioma, in part because it is available in a less expensive generic form. In “Vinorelbine in pemetrexed-pretreated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma”, the Italian authors detail the results of their study on 59 patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma.  These patients…

  • | |

    Repeat HIPEC Improves Mesothelioma Survival

    If one cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC procedure for mesothelioma is good, subsequent treatments may be even better. That is the central message of research conducted at the Moffitt Cancer Center in Florida. The study’s aim was to assess overall survival among peritoneal mesothelioma patients who had not just one, but two or more rounds of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery. The cytoreduction/HIPEC approach has become popular for peritoneal mesothelioma, a treatment-resistant cancer of abdominal membranes caused by asbestos. Cytoreductive surgery involves removing as much of the mesothelioma tumor as possible from the abdomen. Because the shape and spreading pattern of mesothelioma tumors make complete cytoreduction difficult, the surgery is often followed by a rinse with a heated solution…

  • | |

    Value of Mesothelioma Surgery Challenged for Healthy Patients

    New research conducted in Italy and presented at the 15th World Conference on Lung Cancer in Sydney, Australia suggests that mesothelioma surgery – no matter what kind – may not offer a survival advantage over medical management for the healthiest of patients. Mesothelioma is a rare but aggressive malignancy that is highly resistant to standard cancer treatments. The two types of mesothelioma surgery considered to be options for people with resectable cancer are pleurectomy decortication (P/D) or extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). While EPP is more radical than P/D because it involves removing a lung, both carry a heavy risk of complications and, according to the Italian researchers, may not be of value for certain patients. The study reviewed data from 1,365…