| |

Could an Inhaled Vaccine Help Prevent Mesothelioma?

inhaled vaccineResearch at MIT suggests that an inhaled vaccine may trigger a strong immune response against infections and even cancer in the lungs. The findings could be good news for people at risk for the rare lung-related cancer, pleural mesothelioma. 

Lung infections often start on mucosal membranes. So researchers developed a vaccine that binds to a protein in mucus. When they immunized mice in a way that mimics an inhaled vaccine, their lungs produced many T-cells. T-cells are immune system cells that can help fight infections and cancer. 

Pleural mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos. Right now, there is no way to vaccinate against it and no cure. If an inhaled vaccine could bring more T-cells to the lungs of at-risk people, it might help prevent mesothelioma tumors.  

The Advantage of an Inhaled Vaccine

In their new paper, the MIT scientists focused on triggering an immune response. The immune system is a powerful ally against cancers like malignant mesothelioma. If a T-cell recognizes a cancer cell as an enemy, it can kill it before the cell turns into a tumor. 

An inhaled vaccine is of special interest to doctors who treat patients with lung conditions like pleural mesothelioma or lung cancer. Unlike vaccines that go into a muscle, an inhaled vaccine goes directly into the lungs. 

Pleural mesothelioma occurs on the membrane around the lungs. It can spread into the lung tissue and, eventually, into other organs, too. The key to preventing the spread of mesothelioma and many other kinds of cancer is to stop it before it develops. 

MIT researchers theorized that if an inhaled vaccine could bring more T-cells to the mucosal membrane, these immune system cells might have a better chance to kill potential cancer cells. 

Crossing the Mucosal Barrier

The MIT researchers published their findings in the journal Science Immunology. Lead researcher Darrell Irvine says his team used the protein albumin as a sort of “Trojan horse” to get the test vaccine across the mucosal barrier.

“In some cases, vaccines given in muscle can elicit immunity at mucosal surfaces, but there is a general principle that if you vaccinate through the mucosal surface, you tend to elicit a stronger protection at that site,” Irvine said in an MIT article on the new research.

That is exactly what happened with the simulated inhaled vaccine. Dr. Irvine and his team created a peptide vaccine against the vaccinia virus. They gave the vaccine a “tail” that binds to the protein albumin. 

Then they gave the vaccine to one group of mice as a muscle injection. Other mice got the vaccine directly in their trachea, which simulates inhalation. The mice that got the inhaled vaccine had a 25-fold increase in memory T-cells in their lungs. 

They tried a similar strategy with a vaccine against melanoma. When immunized mice were exposed to melanoma cells, T-cells in the lungs eliminated them. The same strategy might one day be used to deliver a vaccine against malignant pleural mesothelioma. 

Only a small number of asbestos-exposed people develop mesothelioma. But once a person is exposed to asbestos, there is no way to prevent the disease. Exposed people should know the symptoms of mesothelioma and get regular checkups. About 2,500 Americans receive a mesothelioma diagnosis every year. 

Source:

Rakhra, K, et al, “Exploiting albumin as a mucosal vaccine chaperone for robust generation of lung-resident memory T cells”, March 19, 2021, Science Immunology, https://immunology.sciencemag.org/content/6/57/eabd8003

 

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Doctors Describe "Concrete Therapeutic Approach" for Mesothelioma

    A team of medical researchers in Italy have achieved what they are calling “excellent” tumor control and survival results in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients using a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Caused by exposure to asbestos, mesothelioma typically spreads quickly across the lung-encasing membrane called the pleura. There is no known cure but treatments are improving. In the current prospective study, 20 malignant pleural mesothelioma patients underwent radical pleurectomy/decortication followed by high doses of radiation. After surgeons removed as much of the visible mesothelioma tumor and surrounding tissue as possible, patients received 50Gy of radiation to the effected side of their chest, delivered in 25 fractions. Regions of particular concern for mesothelioma regrowth got an extra radiation “boost” to…

  • | |

    Does Radiotherapy Reduce Mesothelioma Pain?

    A new study says there is not enough evidence to support the use of radiotherapy for the treatment of pain associated with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Researchers at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland reviewed a range of past studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy by searching databases that date back as far as 1974. To be eligible to be included in their review, the study had to focus on malignant pleural mesothelioma and radiotherapy given “with the intent of improving pain”. The study also had to report doses and fractionation of the radiotherapy and how the pain responded. In all, the researchers found eight studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy that met the criteria. Two of the studies were prospective…

  • | |

    Radiotherapy for Mesothelioma: Better But Still Limited

    A form of highly-targeted radiation therapy for mesothelioma is better than it used to be, but is still risky. That is the message of a recent article on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Author Kenneth E. Rosenzweig, MD, a Radiation Oncologist with Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, reviewed recent studies on IMRT and mesothelioma. He concludes that, while the “troubling toxicity” associated with IMRT when it was first introduced has not been entirely eliminated, the fact that clinicians now have more experience with it is making a positive difference for mesothelioma patients. Before targeted therapies like IMRT were available, high-dose radiation was not usually a feasible option for mesothelioma since the irregular shape…

  • | |

    A Second-Line Option for Mesothelioma?

    Although survival was not significantly extended, the chemotherapy drug vinorelbine might be a treatment option for mesothelioma patients whose cancer has returned after first-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed. A new study on vinorelbine as a second-line treatment finds that the drug is “moderately active” in mesothelioma patients who were initially treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Pemetrexed (Alimta), along with a platinum-based drug like cisplatin, is the primary first-line drug therapy for mesothelioma. But vinorelbine is gaining attention as a possible option for mesothelioma, in part because it is available in a less expensive generic form. In “Vinorelbine in pemetrexed-pretreated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma”, the Italian authors detail the results of their study on 59 patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma.  These patients…

  • | |

    Repeat HIPEC Improves Mesothelioma Survival

    If one cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC procedure for mesothelioma is good, subsequent treatments may be even better. That is the central message of research conducted at the Moffitt Cancer Center in Florida. The study’s aim was to assess overall survival among peritoneal mesothelioma patients who had not just one, but two or more rounds of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery. The cytoreduction/HIPEC approach has become popular for peritoneal mesothelioma, a treatment-resistant cancer of abdominal membranes caused by asbestos. Cytoreductive surgery involves removing as much of the mesothelioma tumor as possible from the abdomen. Because the shape and spreading pattern of mesothelioma tumors make complete cytoreduction difficult, the surgery is often followed by a rinse with a heated solution…

  • | |

    Value of Mesothelioma Surgery Challenged for Healthy Patients

    New research conducted in Italy and presented at the 15th World Conference on Lung Cancer in Sydney, Australia suggests that mesothelioma surgery – no matter what kind – may not offer a survival advantage over medical management for the healthiest of patients. Mesothelioma is a rare but aggressive malignancy that is highly resistant to standard cancer treatments. The two types of mesothelioma surgery considered to be options for people with resectable cancer are pleurectomy decortication (P/D) or extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). While EPP is more radical than P/D because it involves removing a lung, both carry a heavy risk of complications and, according to the Italian researchers, may not be of value for certain patients. The study reviewed data from 1,365…