| | | |

Many Pleural Mesothelioma Patients May Be Missing Out on Life-Extending Treatments

Support for mesothelioma patientsToo many patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma are not getting the trimodality treatment protocol that could significantly change their outcomes.

That is the finding of a newly-published study conducted at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas.

Researchers reviewed the records of more than 20,000 patients in the National Cancer Database with a definitive diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma between 2004 and 2014.

They discovered that, even though a combination of therapies has been shown to yield the best mesothelioma outcomes, too many patients were not being given the option of multi-modal treatment.

Mesothelioma Treatment Patterns “Vary Widely”

Among the 20,561 mesothelioma patients included in the study, only 4,028 underwent cancer-directed surgery. Of those, just 533 (2.6% of the total) received additional treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This combination in known as trimodality treatment.

“Many malignant pleural mesothelioma patients are not treated with trimodality therapy, with significant variation in treatment patterns,” writes study author David B. Nelson, MD, in the European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

Most of the mesothelioma patients who did not receive at least chemotherapy after their cancer surgery were those in the earliest cohorts. The team reports that the use of surgery with chemotherapy increased by 87 percent during the ten year study period.

There was, however, no statistically significant change in the use of trimodal mesothelioma therapy which would also include radiotherapy.

Mesothelioma Survival May be Impacted

The lack of trimodal therapy for so many patients is significant because malignant mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive malignancy that rarely responds to a single type of cancer treatment.

Findings released earlier this year by the MD Anderson team demonstrated longer mesothelioma survival in patients who received a combination of cancer-directed surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation.

The impact was especially significant in those with the most common subtype of pleural mesothelioma called epithelioid mesothelioma. For these patients, trimodal therapy extended mesothelioma survival by nearly nine months from 14.5 to 23.4 months.

Older Patients Less Likely to Receive Trimodal Mesothelioma Treatment

The mesothelioma patients who were most likely to receive all three types of therapy for malignant mesothelioma were those who

  • Were younger than 70
  • Had a comorbidity (other health problems) score of 0
  • Had private insurance

Patients who were fortunate enough to be treated at a major academic center (where experts have more experience with mesothelioma) or those who traveled at least 26 miles for treatment were also more likely to undergo trimodal mesothelioma therapy, increasing their odds of survival.

The researchers conclude that more mesothelioma patients should be referred to “high volume and specialized centers” where they can not only access more therapeutic options like trimodal mesothelioma treatment, but where they are also more likely to have the opportunity to enroll in a clinical trial.

Source:

Nelson, DM, “Predictors of trimodality therapy and trends in therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma”, December 2, 2017, European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Epub ahead of print

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Doctors Describe "Concrete Therapeutic Approach" for Mesothelioma

    A team of medical researchers in Italy have achieved what they are calling “excellent” tumor control and survival results in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients using a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Caused by exposure to asbestos, mesothelioma typically spreads quickly across the lung-encasing membrane called the pleura. There is no known cure but treatments are improving. In the current prospective study, 20 malignant pleural mesothelioma patients underwent radical pleurectomy/decortication followed by high doses of radiation. After surgeons removed as much of the visible mesothelioma tumor and surrounding tissue as possible, patients received 50Gy of radiation to the effected side of their chest, delivered in 25 fractions. Regions of particular concern for mesothelioma regrowth got an extra radiation “boost” to…

  • | |

    Does Radiotherapy Reduce Mesothelioma Pain?

    A new study says there is not enough evidence to support the use of radiotherapy for the treatment of pain associated with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Researchers at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland reviewed a range of past studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy by searching databases that date back as far as 1974. To be eligible to be included in their review, the study had to focus on malignant pleural mesothelioma and radiotherapy given “with the intent of improving pain”. The study also had to report doses and fractionation of the radiotherapy and how the pain responded. In all, the researchers found eight studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy that met the criteria. Two of the studies were prospective…

  • | |

    Radiotherapy for Mesothelioma: Better But Still Limited

    A form of highly-targeted radiation therapy for mesothelioma is better than it used to be, but is still risky. That is the message of a recent article on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Author Kenneth E. Rosenzweig, MD, a Radiation Oncologist with Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, reviewed recent studies on IMRT and mesothelioma. He concludes that, while the “troubling toxicity” associated with IMRT when it was first introduced has not been entirely eliminated, the fact that clinicians now have more experience with it is making a positive difference for mesothelioma patients. Before targeted therapies like IMRT were available, high-dose radiation was not usually a feasible option for mesothelioma since the irregular shape…

  • | |

    A Second-Line Option for Mesothelioma?

    Although survival was not significantly extended, the chemotherapy drug vinorelbine might be a treatment option for mesothelioma patients whose cancer has returned after first-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed. A new study on vinorelbine as a second-line treatment finds that the drug is “moderately active” in mesothelioma patients who were initially treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Pemetrexed (Alimta), along with a platinum-based drug like cisplatin, is the primary first-line drug therapy for mesothelioma. But vinorelbine is gaining attention as a possible option for mesothelioma, in part because it is available in a less expensive generic form. In “Vinorelbine in pemetrexed-pretreated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma”, the Italian authors detail the results of their study on 59 patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma.  These patients…

  • | |

    Repeat HIPEC Improves Mesothelioma Survival

    If one cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC procedure for mesothelioma is good, subsequent treatments may be even better. That is the central message of research conducted at the Moffitt Cancer Center in Florida. The study’s aim was to assess overall survival among peritoneal mesothelioma patients who had not just one, but two or more rounds of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery. The cytoreduction/HIPEC approach has become popular for peritoneal mesothelioma, a treatment-resistant cancer of abdominal membranes caused by asbestos. Cytoreductive surgery involves removing as much of the mesothelioma tumor as possible from the abdomen. Because the shape and spreading pattern of mesothelioma tumors make complete cytoreduction difficult, the surgery is often followed by a rinse with a heated solution…

  • | |

    Value of Mesothelioma Surgery Challenged for Healthy Patients

    New research conducted in Italy and presented at the 15th World Conference on Lung Cancer in Sydney, Australia suggests that mesothelioma surgery – no matter what kind – may not offer a survival advantage over medical management for the healthiest of patients. Mesothelioma is a rare but aggressive malignancy that is highly resistant to standard cancer treatments. The two types of mesothelioma surgery considered to be options for people with resectable cancer are pleurectomy decortication (P/D) or extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). While EPP is more radical than P/D because it involves removing a lung, both carry a heavy risk of complications and, according to the Italian researchers, may not be of value for certain patients. The study reviewed data from 1,365…