| |

Clinical Trial Participation: Perspectives from Mesothelioma Patients and Caregivers

Perspectives of Clinical Trial Participation from Mesothelioma Patients and CaregiversClinical trial participation is a common topic for mesothelioma patients and their caregivers.

Treatment options for mesothelioma are increasing. This is a direct result of the number of clinical trials available to patients. Yet, little is known about patients’ and relatives’ feelings about trial participation.

A new study provides insight into people’s experiences of clinical trial participation. They also report what factors influence decision-making.

Scientists interviewed twelve people, comprising five mesothelioma patients and seven relatives. They identified four themes related to the experience of mesothelioma.

First, is the physicality of the disease. Second, the patient’s quality of life. Third, uncertainty and risk are associated with mesothelioma. And fourth, planning for an unpredictable future. A further theme included attitudes on clinical trial participation.

Physicality and Physical Health of Mesothelioma Patients

Patients and caregivers are both concerned about the physical aspects of mesothelioma. Being breathless during activities gave strong emotions such as frustration and anger.

A few patients recognized that their physical strength was deteriorating. This often created sadness and regret in at the new reality of their illness.

Patients and their relatives were aware of the physical health side effects. This influenced the experience of clinical trial participation. Many people expressed relief at not being randomized to receive the trial treatment.

Quality of Life for Mesothelioma Patients

Quality of life was important to patients and relatives. This was especially true in the limited life expectancy context. And, it was an important factor in the decision on clinical trial participation.

Many reviewed the time they had left to live against how they felt during that time. There was a common awareness that the patient’s situation was likely to change in the future.

Anna Bibby from the University of Bristol Medical School said, “For most, living longer was not desirable unless accompanied by good quality of life.”

Uncertainty and Risk

Mesothelioma patients are knowledgeable. They actively seek information from many sources to assist indecision-making. They prefer factual, numerical data. And they want the information to be presented as unequivocal or absolute.

Most dislike uncertainty and express frustration if the information is not specific. A patient’s desire for certainty has implications on clinical trial participation.

Planning For an Unpredictable Future

Mesothelioma patients and their families seek certainty as a coping strategy. It helps them to manage the uncertainty of their future. Patients are aware that they are likely to die as a result of their illness. But the inability to predict their personal experience causes worry.

Caregivers are concerned for their loved one’s future. Despite this, both patients and relatives kept a positive outlook.

Attitudes to Research and Factors Influencing Participation

Mesothelioma patients and their families were generally positive about clinical research. Most recognized that clinical trials were important to develop new knowledge about mesothelioma. Research generates new treatment options.

Most participated in research for altruistic reasons. Research provided hope for helping other patients in the future. Some people were aware that trial participation could benefit them. But this was rarely their primary motivation.

Other people said it was a desire to repay the care they had received from their doctors. Patients were well informed about the science supporting the clinical trial research. Relatives were generally supportive of their family member’s decision to take part in the research.

Yet, families were often concerned about the downsides. Some were reluctant for their family members to take part in the trial. Clinical trial participants often remained committed to their decision, even after adverse events. But their relatives often felt anxiety.

Patients, Caregivers, and Clinical Trial Participation

A new study provided insight into the experiences of those living with mesothelioma. Participants valued physical strength. They were careful not to jeopardize it with potential medication side effects.

Next, their quality of life was important and was often prioritized over survival. Many participants found the uncertainty of their disease challenging. The desire for certainty affected their risk perception. This is an important factor in decision-making.

Relatives often advocated on behalf of patients. They were more worried about research participation due to concern about potential risks. Clinical trials multiply as more effective therapies are approved for use in mesothelioma. Patient physicality, quality of life, and uncertainty are important.

This new data argue that relatives were less enthusiastic about research. Their reluctance may reflect the higher levels of anxiety experienced by caregivers. Or, it may be an example of relatives advocating on behalf of stoical patients.

Either way, it emphasizes the different experiences and concerns of relatives compared with patients. This is an important factor in clinical trial decision-making.

Source

Bibby, A.C., Morley, A.J., Keenan, E., Maskell, N.A., Gooberman-Hill, R., The priorities of people withmesothelioma and their carers: A qualitative interview study of trial participation and treatment decisions,European Journal of Oncology Nursing (2022), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102111.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Mesothelioma survivor Paul Kraus, alive and well 19 years after writing “Surviving Mesothelioma and Other Cancers

    Paul Kraus is considered the longest documented mesothelioma survivor in the world. He was diagnosed in 1997 with mesothelioma so widespread that he was given little hope of survival. Not willing to give up, he worked with a team of doctors to create his own tailored treatment protocol. This protocol included dramatic life style change, experimental therapies, dietary changes, mind-body medicine, and other modalities. Paul was fortunate. The protocol he and his doctors created helped him keep the mesothelioma in check. His book “Surviving Mesothelioma and Other Cancers: A Patient’s Guide” details his cancer voyage, the decisions he made, and his philosophies about health and healing. This book is now the best-selling mesothelioma book in the world and has inspired…

  • | |

    Doctors Describe "Concrete Therapeutic Approach" for Mesothelioma

    A team of medical researchers in Italy have achieved what they are calling “excellent” tumor control and survival results in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients using a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Caused by exposure to asbestos, mesothelioma typically spreads quickly across the lung-encasing membrane called the pleura. There is no known cure but treatments are improving. In the current prospective study, 20 malignant pleural mesothelioma patients underwent radical pleurectomy/decortication followed by high doses of radiation. After surgeons removed as much of the visible mesothelioma tumor and surrounding tissue as possible, patients received 50Gy of radiation to the effected side of their chest, delivered in 25 fractions. Regions of particular concern for mesothelioma regrowth got an extra radiation “boost” to…

  • | |

    Does Radiotherapy Reduce Mesothelioma Pain?

    A new study says there is not enough evidence to support the use of radiotherapy for the treatment of pain associated with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Researchers at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland reviewed a range of past studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy by searching databases that date back as far as 1974. To be eligible to be included in their review, the study had to focus on malignant pleural mesothelioma and radiotherapy given “with the intent of improving pain”. The study also had to report doses and fractionation of the radiotherapy and how the pain responded. In all, the researchers found eight studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy that met the criteria. Two of the studies were prospective…

  • |

    Ape Virus Shrinks Mesothelioma Tumors in Lab

    A virus that causes leukemia in gibbon apes may have the power to help fight malignant mesothelioma in people. Gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV) has been tested for years as a viral vector, a carrier of therapeutic genetic information, in the treatment of various human illnesses, including cancer. A new study in Japan compared GALV with a leukemia virus derived from mice to see which carrier communicated most efficiently with mesothelioma cells. While both types of viruses replicated in most of the mesothelioma cell lines tested, the mouse-derived virus was not effective in a mesothelioma cell line called ACC-MESO-1. In this cell line, only the GALV spread efficiently both in culture and in mice that had been given human mesothelioma…

  • | |

    Radiotherapy for Mesothelioma: Better But Still Limited

    A form of highly-targeted radiation therapy for mesothelioma is better than it used to be, but is still risky. That is the message of a recent article on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Author Kenneth E. Rosenzweig, MD, a Radiation Oncologist with Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, reviewed recent studies on IMRT and mesothelioma. He concludes that, while the “troubling toxicity” associated with IMRT when it was first introduced has not been entirely eliminated, the fact that clinicians now have more experience with it is making a positive difference for mesothelioma patients. Before targeted therapies like IMRT were available, high-dose radiation was not usually a feasible option for mesothelioma since the irregular shape…

  • | |

    A Second-Line Option for Mesothelioma?

    Although survival was not significantly extended, the chemotherapy drug vinorelbine might be a treatment option for mesothelioma patients whose cancer has returned after first-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed. A new study on vinorelbine as a second-line treatment finds that the drug is “moderately active” in mesothelioma patients who were initially treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Pemetrexed (Alimta), along with a platinum-based drug like cisplatin, is the primary first-line drug therapy for mesothelioma. But vinorelbine is gaining attention as a possible option for mesothelioma, in part because it is available in a less expensive generic form. In “Vinorelbine in pemetrexed-pretreated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma”, the Italian authors detail the results of their study on 59 patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma.  These patients…