| | | | | | | |

Scoring Tool Helps Doctors Select Mesothelioma Patients for Clinical Trials

41221_Clinical TrialResearchers in London have developed a new way of categorizing patients with advanced malignant mesothelioma that allows them to predict who will benefit the most from participation in a Phase I clinical trial.

The Drug Development Unit at the Royal Marsden Hospital already uses a prognostic scoring system for cancer patients to determine which patients would be good candidates for Phase 1 clinical trials of new treatments.

The RPS, as it is called, is based on the level of a blood protein called albumin, the number of disease sites, and the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level.

Choosing Good Mesothelioma Trial Candidates

But because of the unique way in which malignant mesothelioma forms and grows, and because it often stays localized for longer than other cancers before spreading to other parts of the body, the team determined that mesothelioma patients needed their own prognostic scoring scale.

To come up with a special Phase I trial candidacy scale specifically for people diagnosed with advanced mesothelioma (the m-RPS), the research team evaluated the results of 38 Phase I trials between 2003 and November 2015.

For each treatment, efficacy was assessed based on the patients’ response rates, how long they survived before their mesothelioma relapsed, and overall survival.

Mesothelioma Patients and Phase I Trials

Among the 65 patients with advanced mesothelioma who were included in the retrospective study, the median time to relapse (called progression free survival or PFS) during a Phase I trial was 2.5 months and overall survival was 8 months.

“The m-RPS was developed comprising of three different prognostic factors: a neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio greater than 3, the presence of more than two disease sites, and albumin levels less than 35 from the MVA,” writes study author Dionysis Papadatos-Pastos, MD, a medical oncologist with University College London Hospitals.

The researchers assigned one point for each of these three factors. Mesothelioma patients in a Phase I trial who had only one of the factors had a median overall survival of 13.4 months, whereas those with scores of two or three factors had a median overall survival of just four months.

Most mesothelioma patients experienced some toxicity during their Phase I trial but 28 percent of patients had more serious complications.

Phase I Clinical Trials Good for Most Patients

Most of the patients involved in a Phase I clinical trial for advanced mesothelioma tolerated the treatments well and showed signs of antitumor activity.

Dr. Papadatos-Pastos says using the m-PRS criteria will allow him and other oncologists to select the most suitable candidates for future mesothelioma clinical trials. The study concludes with the suggestion that the m-RPS be prospectively validated.

Advanced mesothelioma patients are often encouraged to consider participating in a clinical trial because there are few viable mesothelioma treatments available. Mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos and is highly resistant to conventional cancer therapies.

Source:

Papadatos-Pastos, D, et al, “Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with advanced mesothelioma treated in a phase I clinical trials unit”, February 16, 2017, European Journal of Cancer, Epub ahead of print

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Mesothelioma survivor Paul Kraus, alive and well 19 years after writing “Surviving Mesothelioma and Other Cancers

    Paul Kraus is considered the longest documented mesothelioma survivor in the world. He was diagnosed in 1997 with mesothelioma so widespread that he was given little hope of survival. Not willing to give up, he worked with a team of doctors to create his own tailored treatment protocol. This protocol included dramatic life style change, experimental therapies, dietary changes, mind-body medicine, and other modalities. Paul was fortunate. The protocol he and his doctors created helped him keep the mesothelioma in check. His book “Surviving Mesothelioma and Other Cancers: A Patient’s Guide” details his cancer voyage, the decisions he made, and his philosophies about health and healing. This book is now the best-selling mesothelioma book in the world and has inspired…

  • | |

    Doctors Describe "Concrete Therapeutic Approach" for Mesothelioma

    A team of medical researchers in Italy have achieved what they are calling “excellent” tumor control and survival results in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients using a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Caused by exposure to asbestos, mesothelioma typically spreads quickly across the lung-encasing membrane called the pleura. There is no known cure but treatments are improving. In the current prospective study, 20 malignant pleural mesothelioma patients underwent radical pleurectomy/decortication followed by high doses of radiation. After surgeons removed as much of the visible mesothelioma tumor and surrounding tissue as possible, patients received 50Gy of radiation to the effected side of their chest, delivered in 25 fractions. Regions of particular concern for mesothelioma regrowth got an extra radiation “boost” to…

  • |

    Mesothelioma Still Rising Despite Ban in Ireland

    A study in Ireland confirms that it can take many years for a ban on asbestos to have a measurable impact on a country’s rates of malignant mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is the most serious of a list of diseases – including lung cancer, pleural plaques, asbestosis, and others – linked with exposure to asbestos dust. Affecting the linings around the lungs and other organs, mesothelioma is often resistant to most cancer treatments and may be fatal within a year of diagnosis. According to the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat, Ireland is one of 55 countries that have enacted some type of asbestos ban. However, although Ireland banned asbestos in 2000, a new study published in Cancer Epidemiology shows that incidence of the…

  • | |

    Does Radiotherapy Reduce Mesothelioma Pain?

    A new study says there is not enough evidence to support the use of radiotherapy for the treatment of pain associated with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Researchers at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland reviewed a range of past studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy by searching databases that date back as far as 1974. To be eligible to be included in their review, the study had to focus on malignant pleural mesothelioma and radiotherapy given “with the intent of improving pain”. The study also had to report doses and fractionation of the radiotherapy and how the pain responded. In all, the researchers found eight studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy that met the criteria. Two of the studies were prospective…

  • |

    Website Aims to Protect Homeowners from Mesothelioma

    Australia’s Cancer Council is trying to educate home renovators about their risk for mesothelioma with a new e-learning course. Australia has one of the highest per capita rates of mesothelioma in the world, largely because of several asbestos mining operations that were once located there. Although asbestos has been banned from building products in Australia since 1989, asbestos-linked diseases like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis continue to pose a serious health concern. While mesothelioma has traditionally occurred among people exposed to asbestos on the job, Australia is now bracing for another “wave” of mesothelioma victims among homeowners who encounter asbestos while doing their own renovation projects. Cancer Council Australia has launched “kNOw asbestos in your home” in an effort to…

  • |

    Ape Virus Shrinks Mesothelioma Tumors in Lab

    A virus that causes leukemia in gibbon apes may have the power to help fight malignant mesothelioma in people. Gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV) has been tested for years as a viral vector, a carrier of therapeutic genetic information, in the treatment of various human illnesses, including cancer. A new study in Japan compared GALV with a leukemia virus derived from mice to see which carrier communicated most efficiently with mesothelioma cells. While both types of viruses replicated in most of the mesothelioma cell lines tested, the mouse-derived virus was not effective in a mesothelioma cell line called ACC-MESO-1. In this cell line, only the GALV spread efficiently both in culture and in mice that had been given human mesothelioma…