| | | |

Clinical Trials Often the Best Option for Malignant Mesothelioma

Newly-diagnosed patients with malignant mesothelioma are forced to face a harsh reality early on in their cancer journey – there is no universally effective treatment for this aggressive cancer.

In fact, as a highly resistant malignancy, mesothelioma is often unresponsive to even the “gold standard” treatment combination of pemetrexed (Alimta) and cisplatin.

But that does not mean that mesothelioma patients do not have options. Clinical trials, the tools scientists use to test promising new mesothelioma treatments, are a good alternative for many patients.

Clinical Trials of New Mesothelioma Treatments

Although there can be a stigma around drug testing on human subjects, the FDA’s rules governing clinical trials today are strict. No drug can be used on a human subject until it has been extensively tested for safety and efficacy, both in the laboratory and in animal subjects.

Patients who participate in a Phase I clinical trial may be among the first to receive a promising new mesothelioma treatment. During Phase I, researchers are looking to determine

  • The appropriate dose
  • The appropriate treatment schedule
  • Whether there are side effects
  • How effective the treatment is

Phase I trials are focused on safety, rather than survival. They usually last less than a year and include just a few dozen volunteers.

By the time a potential new mesothelioma treatment has been approved for a Phase II clinical trial, it has been demonstrated to be effective in human patients and the safest effective dose has been established.

Phase II clinical trials for mesothelioma go a step further to show how safe a treatment is and how well it works. They may include groups of patients, each of whom receive different doses of the new treatment. Some participants may receive the standard treatment while others receive both the standard and the new treatment.

Phase II trials typically last for around two years and include up to about 100 mesothelioma patients.

Phase III Mesothelioma Trials Compare New with Old

Phase III clinical trials allow doctors to compare a new mesothelioma treatment that has worked well for Phase II participants against standard mesothelioma therapy.

The goal is to determine if the new treatment is either more effective or produces fewer side effects than the standard treatment. If it does, that new drug may replace the standard of care for mesothelioma. This happened with the drug Alimta in 2004.  

To date, Alimta (pemetrexed) remains the only drug specifically approved for the treatment of pleural mesothelioma. However, several new immunotherapy drugs, including pembrolizumab, durvalumab, and tremelimumab, have shown promise in the treatment of mesothelioma in recent years.

Some mesothelioma patients who participated in clinical trials of these drugs have seen marked shrinkage of their mesothelioma tumors and other indications of disease reversal. Trials of these drugs are ongoing.

With a clinical trial, study participants receive the drug at no cost. The trial may also cover other expenses such as travel and tests to monitor the treatment’s effectiveness. Mesothelioma patients can be involved in a clinical trial at any one of the three phases.

Getting Connected to a Mesothelioma Clinical Trials

Because there is risk inherent in using an unproven therapy, the decision whether or not to enroll in a mesothelioma clinical trial is highly personal. Mesothelioma patients should work with their physician and weigh the pros and cons of clinical trial participation.

For a searchable list of current open clinical trials for people with malignant mesothelioma, visit ClinicalTrials.gov.  

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Doctors Describe "Concrete Therapeutic Approach" for Mesothelioma

    A team of medical researchers in Italy have achieved what they are calling “excellent” tumor control and survival results in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients using a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Caused by exposure to asbestos, mesothelioma typically spreads quickly across the lung-encasing membrane called the pleura. There is no known cure but treatments are improving. In the current prospective study, 20 malignant pleural mesothelioma patients underwent radical pleurectomy/decortication followed by high doses of radiation. After surgeons removed as much of the visible mesothelioma tumor and surrounding tissue as possible, patients received 50Gy of radiation to the effected side of their chest, delivered in 25 fractions. Regions of particular concern for mesothelioma regrowth got an extra radiation “boost” to…

  • | |

    Does Radiotherapy Reduce Mesothelioma Pain?

    A new study says there is not enough evidence to support the use of radiotherapy for the treatment of pain associated with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Researchers at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland reviewed a range of past studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy by searching databases that date back as far as 1974. To be eligible to be included in their review, the study had to focus on malignant pleural mesothelioma and radiotherapy given “with the intent of improving pain”. The study also had to report doses and fractionation of the radiotherapy and how the pain responded. In all, the researchers found eight studies on mesothelioma pain and radiotherapy that met the criteria. Two of the studies were prospective…

  • |

    Ape Virus Shrinks Mesothelioma Tumors in Lab

    A virus that causes leukemia in gibbon apes may have the power to help fight malignant mesothelioma in people. Gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV) has been tested for years as a viral vector, a carrier of therapeutic genetic information, in the treatment of various human illnesses, including cancer. A new study in Japan compared GALV with a leukemia virus derived from mice to see which carrier communicated most efficiently with mesothelioma cells. While both types of viruses replicated in most of the mesothelioma cell lines tested, the mouse-derived virus was not effective in a mesothelioma cell line called ACC-MESO-1. In this cell line, only the GALV spread efficiently both in culture and in mice that had been given human mesothelioma…

  • | |

    Radiotherapy for Mesothelioma: Better But Still Limited

    A form of highly-targeted radiation therapy for mesothelioma is better than it used to be, but is still risky. That is the message of a recent article on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Author Kenneth E. Rosenzweig, MD, a Radiation Oncologist with Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, reviewed recent studies on IMRT and mesothelioma. He concludes that, while the “troubling toxicity” associated with IMRT when it was first introduced has not been entirely eliminated, the fact that clinicians now have more experience with it is making a positive difference for mesothelioma patients. Before targeted therapies like IMRT were available, high-dose radiation was not usually a feasible option for mesothelioma since the irregular shape…

  • | |

    A Second-Line Option for Mesothelioma?

    Although survival was not significantly extended, the chemotherapy drug vinorelbine might be a treatment option for mesothelioma patients whose cancer has returned after first-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed. A new study on vinorelbine as a second-line treatment finds that the drug is “moderately active” in mesothelioma patients who were initially treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Pemetrexed (Alimta), along with a platinum-based drug like cisplatin, is the primary first-line drug therapy for mesothelioma. But vinorelbine is gaining attention as a possible option for mesothelioma, in part because it is available in a less expensive generic form. In “Vinorelbine in pemetrexed-pretreated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma”, the Italian authors detail the results of their study on 59 patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma.  These patients…

  • | |

    Repeat HIPEC Improves Mesothelioma Survival

    If one cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC procedure for mesothelioma is good, subsequent treatments may be even better. That is the central message of research conducted at the Moffitt Cancer Center in Florida. The study’s aim was to assess overall survival among peritoneal mesothelioma patients who had not just one, but two or more rounds of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery. The cytoreduction/HIPEC approach has become popular for peritoneal mesothelioma, a treatment-resistant cancer of abdominal membranes caused by asbestos. Cytoreductive surgery involves removing as much of the mesothelioma tumor as possible from the abdomen. Because the shape and spreading pattern of mesothelioma tumors make complete cytoreduction difficult, the surgery is often followed by a rinse with a heated solution…